I am a lawyer. I write this letter sensitive to concerns that each of you, as public servants, might have about attorney-client privilege or litigation risk. Because of those concerns, you might have reasons not to disclose the contents (or some contents) of the “Independent Investigation” Report you have commissioned to uncover facts about sexual misconduct by lakefront staff and the City’s response to it. On the other hand, the competing values of transparency and democratic accountability would seem to be very strong here. But either way, and this is my main point, you should make a stand-alone decision about disclosing the Report, separate from any agreement with Erika Storlie.

Whether to disclose the Report should be the City’s decision – and only the City’s decision. I struggle to imagine any circumstances that could justify forfeiting control over that decision (to Erika Storlie or anyone else) – including, for example, by forfeiting the right not to make a decision now and instead make it later. But Erika Storlie’s severance agreement, unless changed, would surrender all those rights, capitulating to her desire, apparently, to keep the Report under wraps. (The proposed severance agreement would tie the City’s hands; it requires that “The Report and its contents are confidential and privileged and shall not be disclosed by the City unless required by law”).

Giving Erika Storlie, in effect, a veto over disclosure is a mistake. And so is pre-committing to bury a report even before knowing what it says.

If press accounts are accurate, there has already been a cover-up of horrifying allegations here. Don’t compound that mistake with a cover-up of the cover-up – by committing, irrevocably, to cover up the Report on the cover-up.

I’m not the only Evanston resident making these points. If you disagree with them, I think it would behoove you, as public officials, to explain why, publicly, honoring the Mayor’s already expressed commitment, https://www.facebook.com/DanielBiss, “to full transparency with the community as we go through this process.”

By Joshua Karsh

 

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I also vote for “full transparency “, as a tax paying citizen I shouldn’t have to dig up the details of our local government- sordid or not.
    If mistakes were made, full disclosure should minimize the potential for repeating them.

  2. I agree with this letter, and would add that this makes the 2nd “negotiated” high-level retirement in the last few months. I am not the most “au fait” Evanstonian, but I have no idea why it was necessary to negotiate the departure of police chief Cook and there has been no official reason given for that of city manager Storlie. These “retirement” agreements are usually costly, plus there is the cost of searching for and recruiting replacements, meaning that Evanstonians have a stake in knowing the reason for these expensive decisions.