Snapper Poche (left) and John Fournier were the two finalists for Evanston's city manager opening. Credit: City of Evanston

Evanston news delivered free to your inbox! 


With the Evanston City Council still negotiating with its chosen city manager candidate, some local activists are expressing disappointment in the selection process, maintaining the third time the city has gone through the search was even less transparent than the previous two.

After a series of closed-door sessions, Evanston City Council members announced on May 13 their intent to appoint Ann Arbor Assistant City Administrator John Fournier as the next city manager.

But no official vote on Fournier has yet been scheduled, Mayor Daniel Biss said May 17, as the city is still in talks with him.

The city has been without a full-time manager since October 2021, when Erika Storlie stepped down from the job she had held for barely a year. At the time, city officials had engaged an outside firm to investigate allegations of sexual misconduct in the Evanston lifeguard program.

The May 13 release from the city announcing Fournier’s selection said he had led programs including a multi-modal transportation infrastructure program in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and before that finance and parking initiatives in Pittsburgh, where he served as Deputy Chief of Staff to Mayor Bill Peduto.

The Community Alliance for Better Government (CABG) and other groups have been vocal during the search, raising concerns about citizen engagement in the process. 

In a statement May 16, CABG member groups, including Reclaim Evanston, the Citizens Network for Protection and EvanstonToo, said the City Council followed a selection process “shrouded in obscurity,” one that led to a selection “that least represents the interests of the people.”

“What we find distressing, it seems as though this process has become less transparent than it was the past few times,” said Lesley Williams, a board member with CABG, in a phone interview. “So it seems like we’re going in exactly the opposite direction of the way we should be going.”

CABG is a grassroots campaign that supports racial equity, government transparency and political leadership. The group has a leadership board made up of high-profile Evanston activists.

“We have several hundred people on our mailing list,” said Williams, former head of Adult Services for the Evanston Public Library.  “And our job is really to get information out to the public … We’re putting information out there that other people don’t necessarily have the time and inclination to dig out for themselves.”

The activist groups had strongly lobbied for Snapper Poche, the other finalist, who is Program Director for the Bloomberg Harvard City Leadership Initiative, following candidate interviews at a May 3 virtual town meeting as well as with stakeholders and staff.

Fournier’s selection came after the 10-member Council, including the mayor, held several executive sessions, attempting to arrive at the seven votes necessary under city code to appoint a city manager.

Council members ordinarily take straw votes as part of the closed executive sessions to determine whether the level of support has been reached to move forward on an appointment.

CABG members had raised concerns about what they said was officials’ failure to keep the public informed. They also argued there were limited opportunities for public engagement in the city’s previous searches to find a full-time city manager.

In February, Council members turned to executive recruiting firm Stanton Chase to conduct a new search.

The move came after a previous search ended in failure when the top candidate accepted a job elsewhere before employment negotiations could begin.

After City Council approved Stanton Chase to conduct the search at their Feb. 14 meeting, several months went by where “there was a complete shutdown of information,” Williams said.

The city manager recruitment page, which the city maintains on its website to inform the public of developments on the search, was blank, she said.

CABG members learned information about the search, including the fact that six candidates had been invited to interview, only during a report Council member Jonathan Nieuwsma had given at a Fourth Ward meeting, she said.

Williams said surprised residents reacted by asking, “You’re talking to finalists?” 

Betty Ester, co-founder and President of the Citizens Network of Protection, said she wondered what happened to the questionnaires residents were urged to fill out at the town meeting about their candidate preferences – which, they were told, would be published.

“To this day we don’t know where they are,” she said. With the previous search, after the town meeting, survey results were posted, she said.

Asked about the group’s concerns, Biss said Council members received a “ton of input” from constituents that Council members drew on in making their choice. “Which is great,” he added.

Bob Seidenberg

Bob Seidenberg is an award-winning reporter covering issues in Evanston for more than 30 years. He is a graduate of the Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism.

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Other than emailing Mayor Biss 2 months ago stressing that care should be exercised with hiring a new CM, I’ve not been in the mix lately. With this City being hell in a handbasket right now, the process should proceed cautiously. Keep in mind, that the Council, excluding Ald. Fleming & Suffredin at that time, approved firing a CM by a vote of 7/9. It should have been a simple majority, allowing the mayor to step in with a tie to review the situation? It only takes a 2/3 vote to dispose of a POTUS, AND he (or she) is elected! Concluding, there has to be more oversight by the Council to prevent the many events that have befallen us these in past few years.

  2. I disagree with other Evanstonians who supported the other finalist. Here is the note that I sent to my alderman (4th ward) on May 9, 2022:

    “I watched the interviews of the two finalists and took the City’s survey.

    I just wanted to let you know personally that, in my opinion, there is no comparison between the two candidates.

    John Fournier is by far the more experienced, pro-active, and creative of the two candidates. I believe that he will be able to hit the ground running and quickly have everyone facing in the same direction — providing good public service, including meaningful public participation.

    Fournier’s interview was like a master class in city management mechanics. Evanston would be doing ourselves a huge favor in hiring him.

    I’m hoping that you agree.”

    I, too, was disappointed that the two finalists were white males. But being a city manager is a technical job that automatically limits the number of good candidates at a given moment. I’m excited to have someone of Fournier’s experience and capacity to communicate in Evanston.

  3. Hi Bob- Nice reporting here. Maybe you could follow up with a piece talking about why there groups don’t support Fournier (i.e., the fact that he has had ethics complaints against him, was the subject of an investigation by the same law firm Evanston used for the beach front, was passed over twice by the city of Ann Arbor for city manager job). That might make for a more complete picture.

  4. Given the lack of transparency and the apparent conflict even among councilmembers on this important selection, the public has the right to know who our ward representative supported in this process. We all need to strongly request this from our councilmember NOW!!!!!!!!