A precedent-setting $395 million 2023 budget was unanimously approved by Evanston’s City Council Monday, Dec. 12, and includes a plan to put public safety pension contributions on a 100% funding track this year.

City Council meeting on Dec. 12. Credit: Bob Seidenberg

The pension decision, which tackles head on one of the city’s biggest fiscal challenges, will mean the city uses $4.49 million from General Fund reserves. In the original budget proposal, City staff had recommended pensions be funded at the 90% level.

Members of the city’s Finance & Budget Committee, only in its second year, joined representatives of the police and fire pension boards to convince other Council members that the time was right to use the reserve funds – which are beefed up by federal COVID dollars and therefore at their healthiest point in years.

But this funding option is only in place for one year. And some city finance officials, including David Livingston, chair of the Finance & Budget Committee, had warned late last week in an interview with the RoundTable that using reserves is not a sustainable approach and that not all the forecast scenarios had been worked out.

Still, three of Livingston’s colleagues on the Committee, City Council Members Clare Kelly, 1st Ward; Melissa Wynne, 3rd Ward, and Jonathan Nieuwsma, 4th Ward, voted for the budget and the 100% funding of the pensions.

“I’m very proud of this City Council for taking the fiscally responsible high road and finally changing course by voting to fully fund our public safety pensions,” said Kelly.

“It has been many decades that the City of Evanston has underfunded our public safety pensions,” she said. This “has led to an exorbitant outstanding debt for Evanston residents impacting the City’s [credit] ratings and incurring huge costs to residents in the form of interests and fees. … This is an historic moment.”

Timothy Schoolmaster, the longtime president of the Police Pension Board, and often in the past a lone voice about the effect unfounded liabilities have on taxpayers, also saluted officials.

“As with all compulsive and addictive behaviors, such as alcohol or drug addiction, or compulsive credit card spending, the first step is always the most difficult, and you are to be commended for recognizing the problem, and deciding to do something about it,” Schoolmaster said in a statement.

“Properly followed up in future years, this sea change can only provide monetary relief to taxpayers, and may stop the warning shots fired across the City’s bow for some years now by the bond rating agencies.”

At the meeting, Council members approved a flurry of other spending moves, taking advantage of the city’s rosiest financial picture in years.

Fifth Ward Council member Bobby Burns proposed the transfer of $2 million from the real estate transfer fund into reparations, bringing that fund’s total to $3 million.

Earlier in the budget process, officials had expressed concern about a funding source for reparations initiatives, addressing housing and economic disparities for Black Evanston residents who were victims of past racial injustices.

A tax on local cannabis sales, which officials were banking on to fund the first $10 million of the program, has been producing less than expected revenue, a staff report found.

Council Member Tom Suffredin, 6th Ward, missed the council meeting because his two young children were sick.

Bob Seidenberg

Bob Seidenberg is an award-winning reporter covering issues in Evanston for more than 30 years. He is a graduate of the Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Dec 12, 2022 Evanston City Council members voicing their need
    for in-person support staff—-
    Most residents do not consider the mountainous community projects
    and constant meeting prep /attendance, ongoing budget reviews, plus
    innumerable resident inquiries and requests that each of nine
    Council members/Wards must constantly manage. Each member must
    also be adept at scheduling time with both external agencies working on Ward project planning, and numerous City committees. YES they deserve staff support (two part-time might be preferable) to first centralize needed
    communication between the Council members and to assist with their
    loaded daily scheduling and meeting planning. The Council could become
    a more unified entity once they receive this support. No business office or
    school district would function without a supporting staff especially under
    the time constraints imposed upon these residents/Council members. I propose “YES” to the request for managerial support for City Council of nine
    which will respect their time and work as our representatives, and also benefit the entire community. Please examine the budgets closely and move this forward. Ceal Hanchar 4th Ward resident 12/13/22