Editor’s note: This story has updated to clarify a quotation of interim Executive Library Director Heather Norborg concerning the City of Evanston firearms policy.

In an apparent rebuke to the off-duty officer who drew his gun on a homeless man in the Evanston Public Library earlier this month, the top library official said there’s no exception to the prohibition against firearms for anyone working there as a safety monitor.

Evanston Public Library policy prohibits the carrying of firearms, said interim Executive Library Director Heather Norborg in a statement delivered at the start of the Jan. 18 library board meeting.

Interim Executive Library Director Heather Norborg said there are no exceptions to the firearms prohibition in the library for safety officials. Credit: Screenshot of Evanston Library Board meeting

The statement came in the wake of a Jan. 9 incident at the main public library, 1703 Orrington Ave., in which an off-duty officer drew his gun while allegedly being beaten by a man identified as Milton D. Altamirano-Sanchez of Chicago. The officer has not been publicly identified.

The incident has stirred widespread debate in the community. During public comment at the board meeting, one speaker questioned the use of an armed security guard without the public knowing.

“I don’t think de-escalation and firearms are copacetic in any way,” said Jarrett Dapier, a former librarian in Evanston, and University of Illinois library information instructor, whose most recent research deals with policing and libraries.

Providing an update on the incident, Norborg said one of the library’s safety monitors responded to a patron who was lying on the floor, and at that person’s request called for medical help.

“The situation quickly escalated,” she said, “and the patron began punching and kicking our safety monitor, who identified himself as an off-duty police officer, and when the conflict continued, drew his off-duty firearm.”

“Evanston police arrived at the library and arrested the patron,” she said. “Several staff and members of the public witnessed the incident and I acknowledge that it was very serious and distressing for all.”

Norborg said in her statement that library officials are working with the city’s Human Resources department to follow its processes for reviewing the specifics of the incident, and that she could not comment further on the personnel aspects of the matter.

“However,” she said, “I would like to publicly affirm that the Evanston Public Library Board policy prohibits the carrying of any weapons, including any concealed or partially concealed, in library buildings or on library property, and also that City of Evanston, and by extension Evanston Public Library, employee policy prohibits possession of firearms and dangerous weapons at any time and anywhere while performing … city work.” Norborg said the only exceptions to the city policy are for police officers on duty for police business and animal control officers dealing with a dangerous animal.

“And I would like to publicly clarify now that those exceptions will not apply to library staff who are working as safety monitors or in any other capacity, unless the library board in consultation with its legal counsel were to decide otherwise,” she stressed.

As of now and until further notice when any library employee is performing library work, “they will not be armed,” she declared.

The interim director also outlined other steps the library has taken since the incident to continue address safety and security at the library.

They included reviewing security protocols and working to schedule training on a more regular basis. She said the library is continuing to move forward on filling open positions, including its safety supervisor for whom hiring was already underway, as well as a social worker position that was previously staffed through a partnership with Ascension Saint Francis.

“While it’s impossible to say whether any one staff member might have changed the outcome of last week’s incident,” she said, “we know that these positions broadly are critical to proactively preventing issues in the future.”

Speakers: Library should quit using police officers

Jarrett Dapier, who worked at the Evanston Public Library for six years, and now teaches library information science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, urged the Evanston Library to no longer hire police or ex-police as safety staff.

During the public comment portion of the meeting, several speakers expressed concern about the handling of the incident.

Dapier, who worked at the Evanston Public Library for six years and now teaches library information science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, encouraged Norborg to explain how “it came to be that a staff member was armed with a concealed firearm without the public knowing.”

“It’s very important that from the top down and through every department, there’ll be a compassionate, community-minded and justice-oriented approach to the public that visits the library,” he said. “And that means viewing the mom with three kids who witnessed this terrible, potentially violent event, certainly traumatizing event, as members of the community.”

“They’re members of the community, he’s a member of the community,” he said about the safety monitor, “but so is the man laying on the floor and … any person in crisis.”

“I would also strongly recommend and avoid hiring police or ex-police as safety staff,” he said. 

“And that’s not something I say lightly,” he said. “It’s just typical that police are trained in three things, which is they can detain, they can disperse and disarm – and disarming can mean firing a weapon.”

Kirsten D’Aurelio, a Fourth Ward resident and parent of a school-aged child, said she has noticed a disturbing trend at libraries, recalling an incident six months ago at the Robert Crown library where a white librarian warned some black youths that she would call police in response to their not following library rules.

In this latest incident, “a Latinx man experiencing homelessness and mental health issues had a negative encounter with our library security guard had a gun drawn on him and was sent into the criminal justice system,” she observed.

“Eyewitness accounts speak about the security guard, questioning his patron’s pain and unnecessarily escalating that interaction – which is missing from some of the description that was given tonight of this incident,” she  said.

Sarah Hines, a member of Moms Demand Action, a grassroots group fighting for more measures to protect the public from gun violence, also pressed for more details. She observed that “police violence is gun violence and whether that violence happens while on duty or off-duty is a very serious matter.”

Evanston Library trustees went right into their regular meeting following the public comments, with none addressing the Jan. 9 incident.

Bob Seidenberg

Bob Seidenberg is an award-winning reporter covering issues in Evanston for more than 30 years. He is a graduate of the Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism.

Join the Conversation


The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The last time I went to the library, I could not find a place to sit, it was full of homeless persons who shouted obscenities to me. I went to the bathroom and there was a man in the woman’s bathroom using drugs. I have never seen something like that, let alone up close and it was very disturbing. I have used this library for years and am saddened that it is being managed this way. The city is constantly saying they will have “case workers” that specialize in de-escalation, but the fact is, there are not enough of them for the population of homeless in Evanston with serious drug problems.
    Are there other contracts out besides Trilogy? Why is there this level of mismanagement? If the police are present, it is because the City is not working hard enough to have appropriate people.
    Certain states have had to shut down their libraries to decontaminate them from meth. Here is a link: https://www.9news.com/amp/article/news/health/meth-contamination-littleton/73-2ecb9315-4eab-4c8d-acc4-be3f89dc3be0. We should not be expanding Hilda’s Place or advancing the cause of the Margarita until we have all systems in place to fully care for this population so that these incidents do not continue and escalate.

  2. Always remember that a Library staff member was assaulted, with a chair, at work.

    Library staff has never, and should never, face this violence in the workplace.

  3. The dog beach as well as the other beaches have always been open in the off-season. We have a new city manager, a new head of the parks department, and many new city employees. Why are they treating dog owners differently now, after denying our access to this beach for several years? The lake has receded leaving a large beach, at the north end for some time now. It did not just happen. This year the beaches were free to residents. Why does owning a dog and paying the city for an animal license require those same tax-paying residents to pay still more money for their dogs to be able to use that stretch of beach?
    Equity means that poorer residents be given equal access. When it was opened December 21st, Dave Stoneback, who works at the city said it would be a “six week experiment.” Did the dog-owning community pass their test? Was it a failed experiment? People had been writing letters and speaking to the new parks dept head since March, and the dog beach was opened on *December 21st* finally! (Who opens a dog beach in December??…and with many “enter at your own risk” signs all over. The Mayor and most, if not all, of the City Council are in favor of it being a “YES” for residents (who pay a lot of taxes) and want to take their dogs to the beach year round. It does NOT have to be ADA-compliant as claimed, because it’s an existing facility! Please tell those who claim this as a requirement to actually read the ADA regulations. They also specify that city officials confer with the communities they claim to serve.

  4. The article should address Evanston Police Department regulations for off-duty police carrying firearms. Some departments consider their officers to be ready for duty as backup 24/7, and some require officers to carry weapons off-duty. Off-duty cops are largely exempt from rules and signage prohibiting possession of weapons. So, anyone who doesn’t want their security guards to carry a weapon should probably not use off-duty cops.