Join the Conversation


The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I completely agree with Dave Carpenter. Furthermore, why do some people think that by addressing the weapon rather than the hand that uses it to kill will make us “all be safer?” Why instead don’t we try to understand the circumstances, the environment, that drive some to consider killing as an acceptable way to solve personal problems?
    I bet most among us don’t know or remember that ETHS once offered “shooting classes” and students used to take their guns to school to use them for target practices. Do we ever ask ourselves why exactly that practice couldn’t be allowed today in our schools? What is it that has changed in our society? Are we ok with the fact that today so many children are fatherless? Are we aware that statistics show that children from fatherless families” are more likely to commit delinquent acts, to struggle in school… That the absence of the father is the single most important cause of poverty?
    Changes that scare us are not happening just now: When my kids attended ETHS years back, drugs were being sold right there, in the school. That was several decades ago. Things were happening then and no banning of any weapon did change that kind of societal regression. Why can’t we once and for all consider the possibility that today’s violence has something to do with long coming changes in our society, our families, more that availability of guns, knives or any other easily improvised weapons of violence? The statistics of increase in crime not just in Chicago, but in Evanston, are simply dumfounding. Do we really believe that banning weapons that anyone can buy illegally any time will solve any violence problems? I’m amazed that the League of Women Voters as old an institution as they are, and especially as mothers themselves, seem not to question the very striking societal changes that are driving some among us to kill.

  2. Can someone please explain to me why this law would make anyone safer? The previous rhetoric was that illegal gun possession here was fueled by lax gun purchase laws across the border. The “assault weapons” owners the state expects to register their weapons are not going to constitute the overwhelming majority of those committing felonies with rifles (would you register yours if you were?). In terms of prohibiting the sale and production of such weapons and magazines…Illinois does not have competitive prices anyway. As a person who grew up around gun violence and has been affected by it I see little more in this legislation than a ceremonial “we did it” law. I’m just not sure what we actually “did.” It’s easy to get a gun on the black market in Illinois. Getting one legally is ridiculously arduous and it is part of the fuel for our thriving black market.