Editor’s note: This story has been updated to correct the spelling of Cameel Halim’s name.
Neighbors of the Margarita Inn, 1566 Oak Ave., have drawn up an alternative “Good Neighbor” agreement, offering a new set of requirements governing Connections for the Homeless’ plans to operate a homeless shelter at that site.

The neighbors issued a release April 20 outlining their plan, which they called “a template for Evanston’s first homeless shelter.”
The document includes a number of requirements that weren’t included in the Good Neighbor agreement that Mayor Daniel Biss and Connections for the Homeless CEO Betty Bogg signed in a celebratory spirit at LeTour restaurant last February.
Explaining its origins, Greg Morrow, a spokesperson for the group, said one of the positive things resulting from Connections’ use of the Margarita is “we’ve really gotten to know our neighbors, including some Margarita residents.”
“We’ve formed a group dedicated to accomplishing what Connections wants to do, but cannot due to their funding constraints,” he said. “We have done research, talked to experts in mental illness, addiction, other shelter operators, outreach workers, people who have been homeless for dozens of various reasons, case workers, policy makers, police, and have visited other shelters to really get to the bottom of dynamics at play.
“Our Good Neighbor Agreement is exactly what it should be: a document and program crafted by educated parties who care deeply for Evanston as well as the homeless. Our Good Neighbor Agreement ensures that everyone is respected and that everyone can wholeheartedly support Evanston’s shelter with their time, money and enthusiasm.”
Morrow said about a dozen residents were part of the group which helped draw up the proposal, which he said includes a number of points not covered in Connections’ agreement, including:
- Limiting the building’s capacity to 30 homeless residents. (Current capacity is 70 people.)
- Requiring that any person accepted for residence at the Margarita Inn have a documented history of having lived in a house, condo or apartment within Evanston for at least a year, and that priority be given to children enrolled in Evanston schools.
- Limiting residents’ stay at the Margarita to no longer than 15 months.
- Separating unaccompanied men from women and children, either by floor or by some other partition.
- Installing cameras on every floor and in common areas.
- Providing an anonymous channel, independent of Connections staff, for residents to report if they are being harassed or otherwise feel endangered.
- Prohibiting possession or use of drugs, alcohol and firearms in or around the Margarita Inn, with immediate eviction for violation and sharing of the information with police.
- Providing full-time certified social worker staffing at a ratio of no less than one worker for every 10 residents.
- Requiring monthly professional counseling for residents with mental health challenges or substance abuse issues.
- Providing job training workshops for residents who are able to work.
Months in the making
Asked about the proposal, Nia Tavoularis, chief of development for Connections, noted the extensive process the parties undertook reaching a Good Neighbor Agreement for the Margarita Inn homeless shelter in February.
“Developing the approved GNA took four months and involved more than 30 neighbors coming together to craft the final document, which was signed by Connections for the Homeless CEO Betty Bogg and Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss on February 8, 2023,” she said in a statement.
‘The smaller 15-person working group consisted of two single-family homeowners, two condo owners, two Margarita Inn residents, one renter, one landlord, two Connections for the Homeless staff members, and three members of the downtown Evanston business community, not all of whom were supporters,” she wrote. “Together, this working group met five times and drafted several versions of the GNA before reaching a final document.”
‘More like a PR stunt’
Fourth Ward City Council Member Jonathan Nieuwsma also actively participated in the process and development of the GNA, she noted.
Connections’ agreement pledged mechanisms for clear communications and strong community relations, including a 24-hour phone number and an email that can be used to contact both the Margarita Inn and a Connections Outreach Team.
The agreement would be managed and monitored by an advisory council to include up to 16 members, including one or two from the city’s Human Services Department.
“This agreement is part of an overall oversight structure which includes the new licensing process and an operating agreement with the City of Evanston that is specific to the Margarita Inn,” said Tavoularis.
“All were welcome to participate in the community drafting of the GNA, but the writers of this alternate version declined to participate. This seems more like a PR stunt than an effort at community engagement,” she wrote.
‘Objective standards’
John Cleave, who lives three doors away from the Margarita Inn, has been involved in discussion of the issue since March 2022.
In an email and follow-up interview, Cleave said he was invited by Nieuwsma, in whose 4th Ward the Margarita is located, to work with Connections on the first draft of their Good Neighbor Agreement, “but after much consideration I turned it down after I concluded it was being done for PR.”
He said the project needs “clear, objective standards around operations to ensure that the problem of homelessness is being addressed in a way that benefits residents, neighbors and the city as a whole, and not just trust Connections to do the right thing. We do this with restaurants, and even hair salons, why not with a high-risk operation such as being proposed on Oak Avenue?
“The initial draft, which Connections wrote, stated clearly that it was not a legally enforceable document, and even the current draft does not spell out any operational requirements other than they listen to neighbors (for example, by establishing a hotline and an advisory committee): there is no stipulation that they act in any way beyond listening,” he maintained.
Cleave, who said he provided some support to the neighbors’ agreement, said in his email response that “I’d like to see the combination of the GNA and the Operating Agreement spell out objective, clearly-defined operational guidelines to be adhered to, such as residence acceptance criteria, the process of onboarding, how much staffing must be provided, ground rules for participation in the program, annual reporting requirements, and so on. If these standards are put in place, then I (and most of my neighbors I imagine) would be fully behind the proposed program.”
The neighbors’ proposal came as city action on the Connections for the Homeless request for special zoning is expected to start up again.
The issue was placed on hold in February after a Cook County judge issued a preliminary injunction on behalf of Cameel Halim, the owner of a property across the street from the Margarita, who maintained he was deprived of his right to testify at a city Land Use Commission hearing about the effect on his property.
The plaintiff’s complaint charged that the “City, the Council, and Mayor Biss intend to continue to flout the plaintiff’s right to due process, and will be proceeding to fast-track Connections’ special use through the Council, without having received evidence from the plaintiff and without having permitted the plaintiff to meaningfully participate in any hearing with respect to the special use.”
The request for a special-use permit to operate a rooming house at 1566 Oak Ave. is now back on the Land Use Commission for April 26, with testimony reopened to hear testimony from the plaintiff as required by the court order.
Support the RoundTable during our Spring drive!
As a member of the RoundTable, your support throughout the year supports our work covering all the vital news that matters in Evanston! Please consider making an additional gift during our Spring fundraising drive!
Become a member of the Roundtable!
Did you know that the Evanston RoundTable is a nonprofit newsroom? Become a member today to support community journalism!
The Land Use Commission meets tonight at 7:00 PM. The agenda is posted here —
https://www.cityofevanston.org/home/showpublisheddocument/89190
The LUC states in the agenda that only Halim and his lawyers get to speak on Wednesday. It is specifically stated that “no additional testimony from any
member of the public will be heard on the matter.” I guess this is what the city calls democracy.
I want to hear what Halim has to say on Wednesday. I’ll be there and listening and I especially want to hear the LUC tie itself in knots trying to convince the citizens of Evanston that the Margarita “Does not interfere with or diminish the value of property in the Neighborhood.” This is a requirement under the nine standards for special use required by the city of Evanston.
By the way, according to the minutes of the LUC from 11-30-22, Alexandra Ruggie, Deputy City Attorney, stated that “the city cannot be involved {in a GNA} without an enforcement mechanism” [page 9 of 13]. The GNA that Bogg and Biss signed has no enforcement mechanism. How can this be Ms. Ruggie? What has changed under the law?
Also, at the 11-30-22 meeting of the LUC, Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council to approve the Special Use Permit for the Margarita subject to 17 conditions. This was approved on a vote of 5-3.
One of the conditions (number 17 on page 12 of 13) was “An acceptable Good Neighbor Declaration must be developed within 3 months of the issuance of the Special Use Permit. Here’s the link to the minutes of the 11-30-22 meeting.
https://www.cityofevanston.org/home/showpublisheddocument/87437/638096558275200000
Question — did the LUC ever accept the GNA signed by Biss and Bogg? A big NO! The LUC has never approved the GNA.
Further, how could the GNA even be accepted since the LUC never voted for a GNA? Instead, A “Good Neighbor Declaration” was required by the LUC, not a “Good Neighbor Agreement.” Just read the minutes. This is not just semantics. These are two very different types of documents. Connections must provide the declaration and the LUC must approve it. This has not happened.
It is time to start the Margarita Inn process over. Rules have not been followed. The entire process has been mismanaged and corrupted. Most importantly, the citizens of Evanston have not been represented.
The Land Use Commission meets this Wednesday at 7:00 PM. The agenda is posted here —
https://www.cityofevanston.org/home/showpublisheddocument/89190
The LUC states in the agenda that only Halim and his lawyers get to speak on Wednesday. It is specifically stated that “no additional testimony from any
member of the public will be heard on the matter.” I guess this is what the city calls democracy.
I want to hear what Halim has to say on Wednesday. I’ll be there and listening and I especially want to hear the LUC tie itself in knots trying to convince the citizens of Evanston that the Margarita “Does not interfere with or diminish the value of property in the Neighborhood.” This is a requirement under the nine standards for special use required by the city of Evanston.
By the way, according to the minutes of the LUC from 11-30-22, Alexandra Ruggie, Deputy City Attorney, stated that “the city cannot be involved {in a GNA} without an enforcement mechanism” [page 9 of 13]. The GNA that Bogg and Biss signed has no enforcement mechanism. How can this be Ms. Ruggie? What has changed under the law?
Also, at the 11-30-22 meeting of the LUC, Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council to approve the Special Use Permit for the Margarita subject to 17 conditions. This was approved on a vote of 5-3.
One of the conditions (number 17 on page 12 of 13) was “An acceptable Good Neighbor Declaration must be developed within 3 months of the issuance of the Special Use Permit. Here’s the link to the minutes of the 11-30-22 meeting.
https://www.cityofevanston.org/home/showpublisheddocument/87437/638096558275200000
Question — did the LUC ever accept the GNA signed by Biss and Bogg? A big NO! The LUC has never approved the GNA.
Further, how could the GNA even be accepted since the LUC never voted for a GNA? Instead, A “Good Neighbor Declaration” was required by the LUC, not a “Good Neighbor Agreement.” Just read the minutes. This is not just semantics. These are two very different types of documents. Connections must provide the declaration and the LUC must approve it. This has not happened.
It is time to start the Margarita Inn process over. Rules have not been followed. The entire process has been mismanaged and corrupted. Most importantly, the citizens of Evanston have not been represented.
My family also decided against participating in the initial development of the Good Neighbor Agreement as it was simply a publicity device with no enforcement measures. While the intent was fine, without any enforceability it is meaningless – a “feel good” document, if you will. The version proposed by the neighborhood does have enforcement, measures, supports, and controls.
Establishing a shelter which promotes wellness (sober facility), encourages improvement (e.g. job training), and focuses on a quality of life versus quantity of people housed could result in a more success. Simply warehousing people is not a plan.
This is surely different than what the mayor and Betty Bogg signed at their Le Tour celebratory luncheon but all of the provisions are reasonable. The condition of showing prior Evanston residence ensures we take care of Evanston’s homeless, not Chicago’s or Skokie’s for example.
As a neighbor, I support the “alternative” GNA.
Name calling re: “ PR and publicity stunt” are not helpful in understanding different points of view on this important issue. I am deeply offended that my efforts as a neighbor who voluntarily worked on the signed GNA with other neighbors, businesses and Connections are dismissed. I put time and energy representing the neighbors who DID volunteer on this effort. Diverse options were discussed and the GNA represents a consensus. The issue regarding “legally binding” status was discussed from neighbor, city and Connections point of view. It was “resolved” by making it a required document attached to the Operating Agreement that is legally required by the License.
I also respect the time put in by this other group of neighbors who created a second proposed agreement. I do not see it as merely PR. I find it v disappointing however that these members were unwilling to volunteer their time jointly at the beginning.
Lastly, I will add that I have not seen any negative issues at Marguarita Inn in 2022 or 2023. There were issues before and that is what prompted me to be part of the solution.
Everyone, at the link are documents for Evanston Land Use Commission’s upcoming 04/26/2023 Meeting. Of interest is the 351 page “1566 Oak Avenue – Exhibits Submitted on 4/24/2023” document; a matter of public record:
https://www.cityofevanston.org/government/boards-commissions-and-committees/land-use-commission
The last 10 pages of the “Exhibits” document offer input by Mr. Eddington, and a member of the original CFTH GNA committee. Excerpts:
Statement from Richard Eddington, Chief of Evanston Police Department from 2007- 2018:
“911 calls steeply increased, straining our police department. This resulted in my 2022 meeting with Betty Bogg, Mayor Biss, and others… unfortunately, this meeting did not yield any significant outcomes… As we left the meeting, I expressed my dismay to Mayor Biss. It was clear that CFTH… failed to consider making any changes regardless of the safety risk to anyone. Their default position is, based on the Homeless Bill of Rights. they are not required, or willing, to cooperate with the Police on any level. Connections uses the HBR as a shield to deny oversight and to conceal illegal occurrences including violent crimes and drug use…”
“From CFTH GNA committee member:
“I am here to tell you about my experience on the GNA. It is very clear that this document has not been adjusted to reflect neighbors’ concerns… the GNA committee ended as a group in favor CFTH’s operation of the MI… there was never a real “outreach” to the community. The “listening sessions” only presented Connection’s POV… there was zero compromise, particularly regarding drugs and alcohol… although City Legal Counsel had initially advised that the City should not sign the agreement in an official capacity due to enforcement and liability concerns, C4H was able to leverage their political clout that led to the ceremonial co-signing of the GNA document by Mayor Biss and Betty Bogg…”