Advanced Search

Evanston RoundTable | Evanston, IL
The Weather Network
Evanston Symphony Orchestra


home : community forum : community forum - submit/review comments
November 15, 2019

Guestbook submissions are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

If you would like to submit a message to the guestbook, click here!



Posted: Wednesday, November 13, 2019
Guestbook entry by: Mary Alice Off

Better Parking Needed For Northlight in Evanston
Northlight Theater is set to return to Evanston and that is a real plus. It is a wonderful theater, and I am one of the volunteer ushers. When I usher, especially at a matinee, I notice that there are many seniors, some of whom are in need of walkers or wheelchairs. The current theater has wonderful drop-off areas as well as a good deal of onsite parking including handicap parking.
Currently, the theater has seating for approximately 300 patrons. If you add actors, stage personal as well as ushers, well, you can see the number of people needing some type of parking is considerable.
Northlight has asked for an exemption so they will not have to provide parking. This week’s “Opinion” in the Oct. 31 RoundTable is about THE PARKING PROBLEM.
So allowing Northlight to be exempt from providing parking is compounding the problem.
Walking from the City-owned garages, especially in the winter, is not a realistic solution for the many seniors traveling to enjoy a performance.
To talk about the number of bike racks available is to be totally clueless as to who are the subscribers and fellow patrons.



Posted: Wednesday, November 13, 2019
Guestbook entry by: Harold Bordwell

Three Coffee House Haikus
1. It’s coffee weather.
Davis Street, a light decaf.
The lake, mocha squalls.

2. Behind steamed windows
Computers and paper cups.
Yield: Students at Work!

3. Sherman Avenue.
Two glass doors are pulled open – Double espressos.



Posted: Wednesday, November 13, 2019
Guestbook entry by: Richard M. Kuntz

Do Not Close CAMS
Based on the RoundTable article, Margaret Lurie appears to be the only Library Board member who remembers the citizen struggle to save South Branch.
I would add that the main reason that the Board has the power that it now does to levy taxes and decide the fate of branches is that citizens were incensed at the City Council decision to close South Branch.
At the time, I supported the efforts of Michael Tannen and others to empower the Library Board, but I surely would not have done so if I had known that the present Board would kill CAMS.
If CAMS is moved to a location not next to two train lines, most people without cars will not be able to access it.
There is a reason most libraries are located near public transit hubs.
Considerations of equity should take that into account.



Posted: Wednesday, November 13, 2019
Guestbook entry by: John Austin

Regarding the Council’s Approval of Northwestern's Commercial Events

One of the most disheartening aspects of the Council’s Nov. 11 deliberations on Northwestern’s zoning-change request was the lack of comity afforded Alderman Eleanor Revelle and the Evanstonians she represents, who will suffer most severely from the commercial activities Northwestern is bent on imposing. Five Aldermen from other wards and neighborhoods ignored both the many Seventh Ward residents’ eloquent and reasoned statements against the change – objections based upon their past experience – as well as Alderman Revelle’s detailed and eloquent dissection of Northwestern’s failure to produce the evidence the ordinance requires for such changes. Alderman Fiske’s desire to immunize Lincoln Avenue’s parking from the inevitable influx epitomized the majority’s carelessness, for she neglected even to attempt to explain away the increased congestion her motion would create elsewhere in the neighborhood.

The impact of Northwestern commercialization on wards beyond the Seventh cannot be compared to the inevitable damage to the immediate neighborhood’s quality of life. In this respect, the “local” in “all politics is local” is the immediate neighborhood that will bear the brunt – not those in wards further away, whose residents themselves might well add to the neighborhood’s congestion and disturbance.
Faced with similarly overwhelming opposition from both residents and businesses, surely at least some of the “Yes”- voting aldermen would adopt Alderman Revelle’s cogent reasoning and vote “No” as she did.



Posted: Monday, November 11, 2019
Guestbook entry by: yvi Russell

Three questions in the August 23, 2019 Chamber of Commerce survey addressed financial benefits to the City of Evanston and Evanston businesses. Council members have touted the Chamber survey results as valid, but the figures presented in the survey were False or unsubstantiated, thus invalidating any survey results, which by the way, were never fully disclosed to the public.
Below see what was touted by the Chamber and why those numbers are incorrect.
Chamber Question 6. Were you aware that NU pays a 12% athletic tax to the City on sales of sporting event tickets and that this tax totaled $1.4 Million in 2018?
Response re. #6 = False statement. The 2018 athletic competition tax revenue to Evanston was $1 million dollars, as it was in 2017 and in 2020. In 2019 it was 1,080,000.
Chamber Question 7. Did you know that visitors to Evanston attending events spend an average of $30 per person at local businesses and restaurants?
Response re. #7. First of all, the Chamber never provided any evidence to substantiate the $30 figure. Moreover, the Chamber survey question specifically states “visitors to Evanston attending events”. The question does NOT say Evanston residents neither does it specify the type of events. Moreover, at the community meetings, the Plan Commission and the Planning and Development Commission (P&D), Northwestern stated they would give first dib to the proposed 13 days of events to Evanston residents. In view of such a repeated statement, visitors to Evanston cannot account as the 75% of $30 revenue generating population that NU lists in their P&D power point.
Chamber Question 9. According to NU officials, these events could potentially generate up to $500, 000 in new tax revenue to Evanston. Does this influence your view?
Response re. # 9. At the August 8 Plan Commission, Northwestern touted under oath for their proposed 6 concerts, $400,000 in tax revenue and projected 1,500 attendees for each of the 7 days of pro-tennis. At the October 28 P&D however, Northwestern power point showed an amount that was even less than $200,000 for all 13 days of events combined. Moreover Northwestern increased the proposed tennis event’s attendance daily numbers from 1,500 to 2,500 thus further inflating their athletic tax revenue. NU again quoted a wrong city tax, this time 2% for food and beverages. Currently, the Home Rules Sales Tax is 1%, and will increase to 1.25% in 2021. Finally, and not least, Northwestern has repeatedly stated that they want to keep two temporary events at the Stadium. However they still show 6 concerts on their latest power point chart. According to the submitted proposal NU would only be able to host a total of 6 temporary events. 2+6 = 8. The power point should have shown a further 1/3rd reduction in amusement tax projection and also a parallel reduction in the projected revenue stream to the businesses.
I remind the Council members who are pushing for the text amendment proposal to become law:
The figures touted by the Chamber of Commerce and fed to the Chamber by Northwestern were FALSE. These figures have misled Evanstonians. Moreover, now that Northwestern has literally captured the vivid imagination of some Evanstonians and many City officials in favor of the proposal, Northwestern has suddenly and significantly scaled down the tax revenue it would generate. Thus, in 2021, Northwestern will not be liable to meet the expectations of a tax income touted to Evanston for 6 months and used to convince Evanston officials to approve the proposal , since Northwestern changed that false revenue figure on October 28th, 2019, a date that likely will be too late to change City Council members opinion two weeks later in 2019, on November 11.



Posted: Sunday, November 10, 2019
Guestbook entry by: Timothy Guimond

Open Letter to Mayor and Council Members,

My name is Tim Guimond, I'm an economist and have lived near U-2 for over 30 years. I testified as an economic expert in 1996 (see the attached paper for more details). I was hoping to testify Oct. 28 at the P&D Committee Hearing but was not given sufficient time to do so: we were only given a couple minutes, far less than Northwestern, and inexplicably were called to speak BEFORE petitioner Northwestern, rather than AFTER. This was hardly fair since we were unable to rebut what they said.
I would welcome the opportunity to speak on Monday, Nov. 11. Obviously, Northwestern has the burden of proof that its proposal doesn't negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood, and the Council has a duty to hold NU to this requirement. There are serious concerns about their proposal that have barely been addressed:
1. There's a vast economic literature on the impacts of commercial & professional events that has been ignored by NU, Chamber of Commerce and the Council. Please read the attached document which summarizes the consensus of economists: this is a loser for Evanston.
2. Most "new" spending during these events simply replaces or substitutes for spending that occurs without these events.
3. Other existing spending is "crowded out" because of added congestion during the events. The Chamber of Commerce doesn't acknowledge this effect but it's clear this is why several business owners testified against the 1996 proposal and against the current one.
4. The negative impact on property values is well documented: in 1996 proponent's own study found a 13% decline in property values near U-2 this will only worsen if you vote for this proposal. There's also evidence of actual home appraisals lowered because of proximity to the stadium area.
5. Northwestern contributes very little to Evanston: they don't pay ticket taxes or entertainment taxes, event attendees do they don't pay property taxes, residents and businesses do. Northwestern listed all the utility and other taxes they pay to the city but this is nonsense: it's simply their cost of doing business, and would be paid anyway by hundreds of homeowners if NU wasn't located in Evanston.
I implore you to read my report and consider whether Northwestern has met its burden and whether their proposal would help or harm this city.
Respectfully Yours,
Timothy Guimond



  - Page 1 of 241 -  Page 2




Guestbook Submission Form
Please feel free to sign our guestbook.

Guestbook submissions are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your guestbook submission.
Sign Our Guestbook
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Click to View Upcoming Events
<November>
SMTWTFS
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Submit Event







HomeVideosCommunity PostsObituariesClassifiedsAdvertiseAbout UsContact UsLinksLife
Evanston Symphony Orchestra

Copyright 2008-19 - Evanston RoundTable LLC, Evanston, IL 60202, 847-864-7741, All Rights Reserved


Software © 1998-2019 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved


: