I recently read a beautiful blog on WBEZ’s website by Zachary Nauth on the pleasures of paddlesport.

As an avid tandem and solo canoe, whitewater and sea kayak paddler, I can only support what the author, wrote about the pleasures and beauty a few hours on a local river can bring. I also know that paddlers – once exposed to this environment – become very strong proponents for environmental protection.

Kayaking on the river. Credit: Filip Mroz via Unsplash

One cannot protect, what was doesn’t love…..and one cannot love what one doesn’t know!

As lovely as the article is. I’d like to add a correction to the caption on the photo mentioning Illinois’ 87,000-plus miles of rivers and while this is the RoundTable and not WBEZ, I wanted my Evanston neighbors to know all of this as well.

While it is true that there are 87,000-plus miles of rivers in Illinois, only a very small percentage of these river miles are accessible to paddlers or the general public wishing to recreate in a canoe or kayak.

The reason is Illinois’s antiquated Water Access Law which defines a publicly accessible river as one having been designated as such some centuries ago documenting the use of the waterway for commerce at that time. You can read more here.

I am sad to say the vast majority of the rivers in our state are NOT accessible to Illinois paddlers as was confirmed in last month’s ruling by the Illinois Supreme Court, where the court sided with landowners, saying they can block off waterways to paddlers and fishing enthusiasts.

Yet…there is a glimmer of hope as one of the justices also stated that it is time to change Illinois’ antiquated access law to include recreational uses as a valid activity on a river. We have miles of reasons to do change that law – 87,000 of them in fact.

Sigrid Pilgrim

Join the Conversation


The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Of course I agree with this idea, that our waterways should be open to paddlers. What’s ironic about the law about ‘waterways used for commerce’, is the fact that centuries before that “antiquated Water Access Law” was enacted, the foundation for the history of Illinois involving non-indigenous people was laid in our waterways – by people paddling canoes for the fur trade, as well as just exploration, and sometimes, to promulgate a Christian religion. There is a lot of documentation about the use of Illinois’ waterways by canoe for the fur trade. Some of these voyageur canoes were very big. But we know that canoes can float in very shallow water, including that so shallow that we have to use a pole instead of paddle to advance. Canoes were invented by native peoples exactly for use in these waterways. Is it possible this Water Access Law has an element of racism in it? Or does it just ignore the widespread use of the canoe in the fur trade, because Illinois had not been designated a State of the USA during the fur trade era?

    1. Your comments are excellent. I don’t know why the use of waterways by fur traders does not count as commerce
      Let’s hope we find some legislators to are willing to take up Justice Neville’s suggestion to consider recreation a valuable use if our waterways.
      Thank you fir your support