10 replies on “Open letter to the mayor, city council and LUC: We support Connections’ application for a Special Use Permit”

  1. Love to see this kind of commitment by my neighbors to create a progressive and welcoming community for all. Makes me very happy to be an Evanstonian and proud to raise my young children here.

  2. Excellent letter. The principles of Housing First (developed nationally and not by Connections) show why the demands of some neighbors in their newly proposed Good Neighbor agreement are wrongheaded — they are counter to the basic respect for the autonomy and agency of the individuals to be served. That respect, and treating people as individuals who have different needs, has led to better outcomes in ending homelessness than its opposite.

  3. Yay for this. I’m wondering: does Mr. Halim not reside in the City of Evanston? I hadn’t even considered his residential location, but had assumed that because of his vociferous and litigious objection to this effort, he was a resident here. Maybe he’s just more worried about the success of his King Home project than he is about anything else in Evanston? Which is, of course, legitimate. But I’m offended by his on-going mischaracterization of Connections. Personally, I laud their efforts to help a difficult population. My feeling is: “There but for the grace of God go I.” And one more point I’d like to make is this: Evanston, like so many other urban areas, does, in fact, have a homeless problem. And it is neither caused nor exacerbated by Connections/Margarita Inn. I’d further posit the case that WITHOUT Margarita Inn, our homeless problem would be worse, not better. Have a little compassion, folks. I, too, live not far from Albany Care. Do I love having it in my neighborhood? Not really, but I can co-exist with it as long as some of the more egregious behaviors are controlled. These are human beings, as are our homeless population, who have challenges most of us cannot begin to fathom. We should consider ourselves fortunate indeed that we live among those with the fortitude to help them.

    1. Thanks, Amy. I agree with you. No, he does not live in Evanston. Good point about the King Home project. I grew up near Albany Care and still live nearby. IMO the challenges there are far greater than at Margarita Inn.

  4. Thank you for reiterating the vision we have for Evanston, as a welcoming place for all people. Connections has taken on this challenge, for which I am grateful.

  5. Honest question(s) for Connections and its supporters: The operating budget for CftH is ~$14mm and ~$5mm of that comes from COVID relief funds according to their own financial reports. What is the plan when that funding dries up? Is that being used to support the MI? When their operating budget normalizes back to pre-COVID years (I believe it was ~$7mm in 2019), what happens to all of their new endeavors? Text from CftH’s FY22 finacial report below:

    “For the year ended June 30, 2022, the Organization had approximately 51% of its total support and revenue from funding from the Cook County Department of Planning and Development and Illinois Department of Human Services, of which approximately $5 million is coming from the federal government COVID funding as pass through funds.
    For the year ended June 30, 2021, the Organization had approximately 37% of its total support and revenue from a combination of funding from Cook County Department of Planning and Development, of which approximately $5 million is coming from the federal government COVID funding as pass through funds.”

  6. Gals,
    I support you 100% to end systemic and structural racism and work towards equity for all peoples of Evanston. I have lived close to Albany Care for all my 30 years in Evanston and have not regretted the location……People need a place to live and shelter over their heads.

      1. Thank you for this letter I agree with every point, especially Amy’ comment “There but for the grace of God/the universe go I.” I also grew up and live near Albany Care, which although a different type of facility faces similar criticisms. Really, who does not themselves experience or have loved ones who experience financial issues, mental health issues, interactions with law enforcement, problems with substances, domestic violence? The people seeking help from Connections should be referred to as WE not THEY. Maybe shifting our thinking that way could i still just a little more compassion and pride for serving other human beings. Yes In My Back Yard!

Comments are closed.