After hearing from residents on both sides of the aisle Thursday night, the Evanston Parks and Recreation Board decided to stand by its recommendation to City Council for a new limit of one storage rack per household at the Dempster Street Beach launch facility.

If City Council – which previously sent the item back to the board for further consideration – adopts it, the restriction will go into effect for the 2024 summer season. The change in policy will impact anyone who keeps boats, kayaks or paddle boards at the Dempster launch every summer.

“The part that’s been lacking for a number of years at the sailing beaches is continuous assessment and adjustment. This is an adjustment, and it’s time,” said Lakefront Manager Tim Carter. “I do want to say that staff are not supportive of holding this item until next year. We don’t believe in kicking the can down the road. … This problem will still exist in the future.”

The problem that Carter referred to is that some 667 people are on the waitlist for a dry stack storage rack, which stores boats on land. Only between 10 and 20 racks change hands any given year, he said, so many people have found themselves stuck on the waitlist for years. As of now, the facility can hold 121 single hull boats, 23 double hull boats and 224 “paddle vessels” – kayaks or paddle boards. Forty-nine households use two or more racks and take up a total of 103 racks.

Evanston Lakefront Manager Tim Carter addresses residents at the Parks and Recreation Board meeting Jan. 18. Credit: Duncan Agnew

Several residents, including Payson Wild, who leads the Evanston Sail & Paddle Association, said they opposed the limit, at least partially because many older Evanstonians keep multiple boats and boards at Dempster and can’t easily move them to and from their homes.

Wild and longtime sailor Ken Proskie also urged the board to consider adding more storage racks on the north end of the Dempster Beach. Carter and Michael Callahan, assistant director of parks and recreation, said they would look into that possibility, but many windsurfers and the city’s summer aquatics camp use that same space for staging.

‘We’re out of sand’

“The reality is we’re out of real estate. We’re out of sand,” said Callahan, who mentioned how the city’s beaches have struggled with erosion and rising lake levels. “We are very limited in ever being able to provide everybody with a rack. That’s probably not a realistic goal. So how do we maximize the good for the most possible in the most equitable way possible?”

This particular policy change is part of a larger overhaul of parks and recreation programs, especially on the lakefront, to give more people access to the lake for playing in the sand, swimming and learning how to sail, among other amenities. Traditionally, Evanston’s wealthier white families have dominated those spaces and activities, Carter said, and Parks and Recreation Director Audrey Thompson has made it a priority to give low-income households of color more opportunities to enjoy public spaces like the beaches.

At this time, the city is not considering a lottery for storage racks, according to Thompson. Carter said he also reached out to Northwestern University about partnering on rack storage, rentals and lessons at either the Sailing Center or the Lincoln Street Beach, but the university “is not interested.”

One idea that board members discussed Thursday night, though, is either increasing the fee for nonresidents with a storage rack or removing access to nonresidents altogether.

Plus, while the city collects an annual fee of $210 from every Evanston resident using a rack, it doesn’t verify their address every year, so some people may have had a rack for decades and long ago moved to a different suburb. Carter said he had even talked to a few candid folks who had moved away and started “subleasing” their rack to a former neighbor.

“We have to clean that up,” he said.

The board agreed to check with the city’s legal team and bring that item back up for discussion at its next meeting in February.

Two other changes proposed

On top of the rack limit, the parks and recreation staff have also proposed two other changes for 2024:

  • For boat launch only passes (without a storage rack), residents can pay full price for their first vessel, but only $50 per additional vessel
    • Storage rack users can also try “double stacking” multiple items on one rack if they fit, like keeping a paddle board or kayak sitting inside a boat, for example. By doing so, each double stacked vessel will cost $105 – half the typical price for storing a vessel
  • All vessels have to be put on their racks by June 15. Any empty racks at that time will go to people on the waitlist.

One single mother and teacher said she can’t take her equipment out to Dempster by that deadline date because of work and child care obligations, and Carter said he would talk individually with anyone facing an extreme circumstance.

“How are we going to diversify the beach? How are we going to get it more inclusive? How’s it going to be more representative of Evanston, the real Evanston?” Callahan asked. “It’s going to take time no matter what, but we have to start with a policy that is equitable to begin with if we’re ever going to get there.”

Editor’s note: This story has updated to clarify prices for boat launch only passes versus storage racks.

Duncan Agnew covers Evanston public schools, affordable housing, City Hall and more for the RoundTable. He also writes long-form investigations, features and the morning email newsletter three times a...

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. This has long been an inequitable system, and I’m happy to hear that there will be some changes. I don’t understand why Evanston is leasing vessel storage to non-residents, when there are 600+ people on the waiting list. We have been on the waiting list for five years.

  2. Please don’t make statements that assume all people of color are impoverished and all whites are wealthy. You can included everyone with economic statistics only, to keep bringing up race sounds like pandering.

  3. I believe that the City should strongly consider using Clark Street beach for boat storage and launching instead of Dempster St. Beach:

    • The Greenwood St. / Dempster St. Beach is much nicer for swimming and sunbathing than Clark St. Beach. Due to its orientation, it has a better view and doesn’t have as many water quality issues. In addition, the walk to the water is much shorter and more manageable for families, the elderly and people with disabilities. I do not believe it is a coincidence that Greenwood St. Beach is the only beach to have a drink named after it (Temperance Beer Co. Greenwood Beach).

    • While I don’t have data, it is clear that far more people use Evanston beaches for swimming than boating, and that would remain true even if the entire waiting list was emptied. The Greenwood St. / Dempster St. beach is in closer proximity to more parking spaces and homes within walking distance than Clark St. Beach.

    • The use of Clark St. beach by Northwestern students has dropped significantly since Lincoln St. Beach was opened and promoted to students. As a result, use of Clark St. Beach in general has dropped. While I don’t have data, Greenwood St. beach generally seems to have more users than Clark St. beach.

    • Clark Street beach is already a sailing beach because it has the Northwestern sailing center on it. Moving the City Launch Facility to Clark St. would allow the City to consolidate boat traffic and reduce interference with swimmers.

    • Clark Street beach has far more space to store boats and the related infrastructure (e.g., lockers) than Dempster Street Beach.

    • Clark Street beach has far more space for the city-run summer camps that use boats, which are currently located on Dempster St. beach.

    • Clark Street beach is in close proximity to the motorized boat launch at Church Street. Locating all boat launch facilities near each other would seem to provide an opportunity to create efficiencies.

    1. Those of us who can’t/won’t have rack space, will still need to haul our paddleboards and kayaks from our vehicles to the water and Clark doesn’t have parking, nor does it have a ramp to put in sailboats from trailers. What you’re suggesting would require hundreds of thousands of dollars of renovation. Boat traffic could get a bit sticky, too. The shape of the bay at Clark isn’t great for this idea.