Evanston City Council voted unanimously Monday to allow Connections for the Homeless to administer a rent assistance program, the most expensive project approved in last year’s participatory budgeting pilot. It is the first of the seven winning projects to start implementation.

A participatory budgeting expo draws city residents and other eligible voters to the Fleetwood-Jourdain Community Center on Sept. 10. Credit: Heidi Randhava

Connections, which also runs the Margarita Inn shelter, will receive $810,000 of the $3 million in federal pandemic relief funds allocated via participatory budgeting. The nonprofit will use the funds to provide 12-month rent subsidies to the “residents of greatest need,” according to a city memo.

The agreement provides that $150,000 will be used to pay two full-time employees to administer the program, and another $81,000 will be used for administration costs, leaving $579,000 for the actual subsidies. Based on participatory budgeting delegates’ estimate of an average monthly subsidy of $1,500, this could provide two years of subsidies to about 16 households.

Why Connections?

Council Member Clare Kelly (1st Ward) questioned why staff recommended Connections administer the program rather than keep it in-house, or search for other agencies via a request for proposals. Kelly suggested it could be rolled into the city’s general assistance program.

Health and Human Services Director Ike Ogbo said the general assistance criteria are stricter than the new rental subsidy rules, and said his department doesn’t have a large enough budget to administer the subsidies along with existing programs.

Community Development Director Sarah Flax responded that the city often doesn’t issue RFPs for this type of agreement, and that this is allowed by federal government rules. She said Connections has administered federal funding the city receives for tenant-based rental assistance since 2015, and said this experience and high capacity for administrative requirements makes the agency uniquely suited for the program.

“It’s a pretty onerous job, it’s not something that you take somebody and say, ‘Hey, want to try this?’” Flax said. “We seek to work with agencies that are in Evanston ideally, but also ones that, in a case like this, have a history of doing this kind of program successfully.”

No program for homeowners

Council Member Krissie Harris (2nd Ward) asked Flax whether the city provided any similar assistance to struggling homeowners; Flax said the city does not, but added that some relief funding may still be available from the state government.

Harris ultimately voted to approve the agreement with Connections, but stressed the need to help homeowners as well as renters stay in Evanston. Many homeowners, she said, are unable to afford their property taxes or have taken out second mortgages. Harris said she herself is often “feeling that crunch” of affording her mortgage and bills while asking herself, “What do I have to give up in place of that?”

“I’m hearing that a lot from the middle class that are now being pushed down and not able to afford a home, who would then be pushed into a program like this because they can’t keep their property anymore,” Harris said. “I understand we’re trying to be fair and equitable, but we need to make sure that that is across the board, for our homeowners, not just our renters.”

Flax told Harris city staff is evaluating how to address affordability issues for homeowners in a new strategic housing plan for the city, currently in development. She raised the possibility of using funds from the Ryan Field community benefits agreement with Northwestern University, which she said “does not come with the kind of restrictions” attached to funds from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development.

“It’s very difficult right now, with our HUD [funding] sources, to do much for homeownership,” Flax said.

Editor’s note: This story has updated to add comments from Health and Human Services Director Ike Ogbo.

Alex Harrison reports on local government, public safety, developments, town-gown relations and more for the RoundTable. He graduated from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism in June...

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

The RoundTable will try to post comments within a few hours, but there may be a longer delay at times. Comments containing mean-spirited, libelous or ad hominem attacks will not be posted. Your full name and email is required. We do not post anonymous comments. Your e-mail will not be posted.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. “the optimal compensation range for a Grade Teacher at Evanston/Skokie School District 65 is between $49,446 and $71,186, with an average salary of $58,898”—-(from salary.com but wide range of online sources show this figure accurate)…So we’re going to pay someone a considerable amount more than one of our school teachers?—-seriously?—-and not even taking into consideration the excessively mysterious $81,000 administrative fee?—-wow!…seriously hoping someday Evanston residents agree with what I’ve been thinking for years, Connection for Homeless are a bunch of grifters…Mr Sheldon, you’re hired

  2. This is madness. Two full time people at $75,000 each and $81,000 in administrative expenses to find 16 families?

    I’ll run it out of my house and charge only $5,000. That will let me help 22 families for 2 years. l have a desk, a phone, a computer and an internet connection. I can find 22 families in about a week. Everybody wins.

    1. Mr. Sheldon, you are spot – on correct…

      Two years ago I worked for Connections, and at all their locations, including their 2121 Dewey HQ. Att the time, they had roughly IIRC at least *eight* staff at 2121 working in housing advocacy, including at least *four* in their already well – funded rental assistance program (mentioned in this article)… their website shows a similar number of these staff today:

      https://www.connect2home.org/team.html

      So, I don’t know why on earth they’d need any extra funds for “administration” and *two* more staff for this program funding – that $231,000.00 for program costs *sure* could provide a lot of extra funds that could be spent directly on rental assistance… you dont’ need all that extra dough to house *16* families…

      This is a perfect example of the wastage that I see “The Homeless – Industrial Complex” engaging in… *vast* sums are used for padding these homeless services agencies’ bureaucracies… then they always complain “We don’t have enough money… help us!”…

      Respectfully,
      Gregory Morrow – Evanston 4th Ward resident

  3. I’m not sure I understand this but it sounds like homelessness makes you more worthy of assistance than if you are a life-long tax-paying resident who might need assistance themselves. Just saying…

  4. Sorry – I did do the math wrong in my previous comment.

    The correct math is 16 rents at $1500 a month over two years comes out to $576,000 in rent paid. I can’t edit the previous comment but am still kind of shocked that we are paying Connections for the homeless 28% to administer these payments on top of all the other funding that we give them.

  5. More than 25% being spent on administrative costs. 2 full time employees to help 16 families get rent help. Utter madness.